Analysis of Linguistic and Discourse Features of the Essays Written for the York English Language Test
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Banerjee, J., Franceschina, F., & Smith, A. M. (2007).
Documenting features of written language production
typical at different IELTS band score levels (IELTS
Research Reports Volume 7). Australia & UK: IELTS
Australia and British Council.
Barkaoui, K. (2007). Rating scale impact on EFL essay marking: A mixed-method study. Assessing Writing, 12 (2), 86–107.
Benson, B., Deming, M., Denzer, D., & Valeri-Gold, M.
(1992). A combined basic writing/ English as a second
language learners. Dissertation Abstracts International,
(5), 1984A.
Brown, R. (1973). A First Language: The early stages.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brown, D., & Yule, G. (1983). Teaching the spoken language.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Campbell, C. (1987a). Writing with others’ words: Native and
non-native university students use of information from a
background reading text in academic compositions.
(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED287315)
Campbell, C. (1987b). Writing with others’ words: The use of
information from a background reading text in the writing
of native and non-native university composition students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 48 (7), 1679A.
Campbell, C. (1990). Writing with others’ words: Using
background reading text in academic compositions. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 211-230). New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Carlson, S. (1988). Cultural differences in writing and reasoning skills. In A. Purves (Ed.), Writing across
languages and cultures: Issues in contrastive rhetoric
(pp. 227-260). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Chapelle, C.A., Enright, M.K., & Jamieson, J.M. (Eds.).(2008). Building a Validity Argument for the Test of English as a Foreign Language. USA: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Chaudron, C. (1987). Analysis of products and instructional
approaches in writing: Two articles on the state of art,
TESOL Quarterly, 21, 673-675.
Cheng, X, & Steffensen, M. (1996). Metadiscourse: A
technique of improving student writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 30 (2), 149-181.
Choi, Y. (1988). Text structure of Korean speakers’
argumentative essays in English. World Englishes, 7 (2),
-142.
Connor, U. (1984). A study of cohesion and coherence in
English as a second language students’ writing. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 17 (3), 301-316.
Connor, U. (1990). Linguistic/ Rhetorical Measures for
International Persuasive Student Writing. Research in Teaching of English, 24 (1), 67-87.
Connor, U. (1991). Linguistic/rhetorical measures for
international persuasive student writing. Research in
Teaching of English, 24, 67-87.
Connor, U., & Kaplan, R.B. (Eds.). (1987). Writing across
languages: Analysis of L2 text. Reading, MA: Addison-
Wesley.
Cooper, C., Cherry, R., Copley, B., Fleischer, S., Pollard, B.,
& Sartisky, M. (1984). Studying the writing abilities of a
university freshman class: Strategies from a case study. In
R. Beach & L. Bridwell (Eds.), New directions in
composition research (pp. 19-52). New York: Guilford.
Corrigan, A. and Upshur, J. 1982: Test method and linguistic
factors in foreign language tests. International Review of
Applied Linguistics, 20, 313–321.
Crammond, J. (1998). The uses and complexity of argument
structures in student persuasive writing. Written
Communication, 15, 230-268.
Crismore, A., & Farnsworth, R. (1990). Metadiscourse in
popular and professional science discourse. In W. Nash,
(Ed.), The Writing Scholar. Studies in Academic
Discourse (pp. 119-136). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Cumming, A., Kantor, R., Powers, D., Santos, T., & Taylor,
C.(2000). TOEFL 2000 writing framework: A working
paper (TOEFL Monograph No. MS-18, ETSRM-00-05).
Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Cumming, A., Kantor, R., & Powers, D. (2001). Scoring
TOEFL essays and TOEFL 2000 prototype tasks: An
investigation into raters’ decision making and development of a preliminary analytic framework
(TOEFL Monograph No. MS-22, ETS RM-01-02).
Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Cumming, A., Kantor, R., Baba, K., Eouanzoui, K., Erdosy,
U., & James, M. (2006). Analysis of Discourse Features
and Verification of Scoring Levels for Independent and
Integrated Prototype Written Tasks for the New TOEFL
(TOEFL Monograph Series No. 30). Princeton, NJ:
Educational Testing Service.
Cummins, J. P. (1983). Language proficiency and academicachievement. In J. Oller (Ed.), Issues in language testing research (pp. 108-126). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Cummings, V. (1990). Speech and writing: An analysis of
expository texts compared by native and non-native
speakers of English at The City University of New York. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51 (7), 2296A.
Cumming, A. & Mellow, D. (1996). An investigation into the
validity of written indicators of second language
proficiency. In Cumming, A. and Berwick, R., (Eds.),
Validation in language testing. (pp.72–93). Clevedon:
Multilingual Matters.
de la Fuente, M. J. (2002). Negotiation and oral acquisition of L2 vocabulary: The roles of input and output in the receptive and productive acquisition of words. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 81–112.
Dennette, J. (1985). Writing technical English: A comparison
of the process of native English and native Japanese speakers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 46(11),
A.
Dennette, J. (1990). ESL technical writing: Process and
rhetorical differences (ERIC Document Reproduction
Service No. ED 322713).
Ellis, R. (1995). Modified oral input and the acquisition
of word meanings. Applied Linguistics, 16, 409–435.
Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y., & Yamakazi, A. (1994). Classroom
interaction, comprehension, and L2 vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 44, 449–491.
Engber, C. (1995). The relationship of lexical proficiency to
the quality of ESL compositions. Journal of Second
Language Writing, 4, 139-155.
Enos, R. L., & Lauer, J.M. (1992). The meaning of heuristic
In Aristotle’s Rhetoric and its implications for
contemporary rhetorical theory. In S.P. Witte, N.
Nakadate, & R.D. Cherry (Eds.), A rhetoric of doing:
Essays on written discourse in honor of James L.
Kinneavy (pp.79-87). Carbondale: Southern Illinois Press.
Ferris, D. (1994). Lexical and syntactic features of ESL
writing by students at different levels of L2 proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 414-420.
Frase, L.T., Faletti, J., Ginther, A., and Grant, L. (1999).
Computer Analysis of the TOEFL Test of Written English (TOEFL Research Report 64). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Goldschneider, J.M., & DeKeyser, R.M. (2001). Explaining
The ‘Natural Order of L2 Morpheme Acquisition’ in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning. 51, 1-50.
Grabe,W. (2001). Notes toward a theory of second language
writing. In T. Silva & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), On second language writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gebril, A. (2009). Score generalizability in writing
assessment: The interface between applied linguistics and psychometric research. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag.
Gates, R. (1978). An analysis of grammatical structures in
compositions written by four groups of students at Southern Technical Institute: Indo-Iranian, Latin
Romance, Sino-Tibetan, and American. Dissertation Abstracts International, 39(4), 2026A.
Grant, L., & Ginther, A. (2000). Using computer-taggedlinguistic features to describe L2 writing differences. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 123-145.
Hall, C. (1990). Managing the complexity of revising across
languages. TESOL Quarterly, 24(1), 43-60.
Hamp-Lyons, L. (2001). Fourth generation writing assessment. In T. Silva & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), On second language writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hamp-Lyons, L., and Henning, G. (1991). Communicative writing profiles: An investigation of the transferability of
a multiple-trait scoring instrument across ESL writing assessment contexts. Language Learning, 41, 337-373.
Hamp-Lyons, L., and Kroll, B. (1997). TOEFL 2000.Writing: Composition, community, and assessment (TOEFL Monograph Series No.5). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Hawkey, R., & Barker, F. (2004). Developing a commonscale for the assessment of writing. Assessing Writing, 9,
-159.
Hinkel, E. (2003). Simplicity without elegance: Features of
sentences in L1 and L2 academic texts. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 275-301.
Hirano, K. (1991). The effect of audience on the efficacy of objective measures of EFL proficiency in Japanese university students. Annual review of English language education in Japan, 2, 21-30.
Homburg, T.J. (1984). Holistic evaluation of ESL
compositions: Can it be validated objectively? TESOL
Quarterly, 18, 87-107.
Hu, Z., Brown, D., & Brown, L. (1982). Some linguistic
Differences in the written English of Chinese and
Australian students. Language Learning and Communication, 1(1), 39-49.
Hunt, K. (1965). Grammatical structures written at threegrade levels. Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Hyland, K. (1998a). Persuasion and context: The pragmatics
Of academic metadiscourse, Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 437-455.
Hyland, K. (2000). Hedges, Boosters and lexical invisibility: noticing modifiers in academic texts. Language Awareness, 9(4), 179-197.
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in Academic
Writing: A Reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25 (2), 156 –
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in
Writing. London: Continuum.
Intaraprawat, P. & Steffensen, M.S. (1995). The Use of
Metadiscourse in Good and Poor ESL Essays. Journal of
Second Language Writing, 4(3), 253-272.
Ishikawa, S. (1995). Objective measurement of low
proficiency EFL narrative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 51-70.
Kamel, G. (1989). Argumentative writing by Arab learners of
English as a foreign and second language: An empirical
investigation of contrastive rhetoric. Dissertation
Abstracts International, 50(3), 677A.
Kane, M. T. (2001). Current concerns in validity theory.Journal of Educational Measurement,
, 319-342.
Kane, M., Crooks, T., & Cohen, A. (1999). Validating measures of performance. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 21(1), 31-35.
Kaplan, R.B., & Grabe, W. (2002). A Modern History of
Discourse Analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 191-223.
Kawata, K. (1992). Evaluation of free English composition.
CASELE Research Bulletin, 22, 49-53.
Knudson, R. (1992). Analysis of argumentative writing at two
grade levels. Journal of Educational Research, 85, 169-179.
Krashen, S. D. (1984).Writing: Research, theory andapplications. Oxford: Pergamon Institute of English.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1978). An ESL index of development.
TESOL Quarterly, 12, 439-448.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1983). Assessing global second
language proficiency. In H.W. Seliger & M. Long (Eds.),
Classroom-oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 287-304). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Lee, W., Kantor, R., & Mollaun, P. (2002). Score reliability as an essential prerequisite for validating new writing and speaking tasks for TOEFL. Paper presented at the annual TESOL Convention, Salt Lake City, UT.
Linnarud, M. (1986). Lexis in composition: A performance
analysis of Swedish. Lund, Sweden: Liber Forlag Malmo.
Lux, P. (1991). Discourse styles of Anglo and Latin
American college students writers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 06A, 2128.
Mahmoud, A. (1982). A functional analysis of written
compositions of Eygiptian students of English and the implications of the notional functional syllabus for the teaching of writing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 44(5), 1439A.
McCann, T. (1989). Student argumentative writing
knowledge and ability at three grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 23, 62-76.
McNamara, T. 1990: Item response theory and the validation
of an ESP test for health professionals. Language Testing,
, 52–75.
McNamara, D.S., Crossley, S.A., & McCarthy, P.M. (2010).
Linguistic Features of Writing Quality, Written Communication, 27(1), 57-86.
Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence andconsequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13-23.
Moragne e Silva, M. (1991). Cognitive, affective, social, and
Cultural aspects of composing in a first and second
language: A case study of one adult writer. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52(12), 4249A.
National Assessment of Educational Progress. (1980).
Writing achievement, 1969-1979: Results from the third
assessment, Vols. I, II, III. Denver, Colorado: National
Assessment of Educational Progress.
North, S., & Pillay, H. (2002). Homework: Re-examining the
routine. ELT Journal, 56, 137-145.
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the classroom.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Oi, K. (1984). Cross-cultural differences in rhetorical
patterning: A study of Japanese and English. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45 (8), 2511A.
Ouaouicha, D. (1986). Contrastive rhetoric and the structure
Of learner-produced argumentative texts in Arabic and English. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47 (9), 3339A.
Park, Y. (1988). Academic and ethnic background as factors
affecting writing performance. In A. Purves (Ed.), Writing across languages and cultures: Issues in contrastive rhetoric (pp. 261-272). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Perelman, C. (1982). The realm of rhetoric (W. Kluback,
Trans.). South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Polio, C. (1997). Measures of linguistic accuracy in second
language writing research. Language Learning, 47, 101-143.
Raimes, A. (1985). What unskilled ESL students do as they
write: A classroom study of composing. TESOL
Quarterly. 19, 229-258.
Read, J. (1990). Providing relevant content in an EAP writing test. English for Specific Purposes, 9, 109–121.
Reid, J. (1986). Using the Writer’s Workbench in
composition teaching and testing. In C.W.Stansfield
(Ed.), Technology and Language Testing (pp. 167-188).
Washington, DC: TESOL.
Reid, J. (1988). Quantitative differences in English prose
written by Arabic, Chinese, Spanish, and English student.
Dissertation Abstracts International, 50 (3), 672A.
Rimmer, W. (2006). Measuring Grammatical Complexity:
The Gordian knot. Language Testing, 23 (4) 497–519.
Rosenfeld, M., Leung, S., & Oltman, P. K. (2001). The reading, writing, speaking, and listening tasks important for academic success at the undergraduate and graduate levels (TOEFL Monograph No. MS-21, ETS RM-01-03). Princeton, NJ: ETS.
Silva, T. (1990). A comparative study of the composing of the
selected ESL and native English speaking freshman writers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(10), 3379A.
Silva, T. (1993). Towards an Understanding of the Distinct
Nature of L2 Writing: The ESL Research and Its Implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 657-677
Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press.
Toulmin, S., Rieke, R., & Janik, A. (1984). An introduction to
reasoning (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., Kim, H. (1998). Second
Language Development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy & complexity. University of Hawai: Second
Language Teaching & Curriculum Centre.
Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing Writing, Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
Weigle, S. (2004). Integrating reading and writing in a
competency test for non-native speakers of English.
Assessing Writing, 9, 27–55.
Witte, S.P, & Faigley, L. (1981). Coherence, Cohesion andWriting Quality. College composition andCommunications, 32(2), 189-204
Xu, G. (1990). An ex post facto study of differences in the
Structure of the standard expository paragraphs between
written compositions by native and nonnative speakers of
English at the college level. Dissertation Abstracts
International, 51(6), 1942A.
Yang, Y. (2001). Chinese interference in English writing:
Cultural and linguistic differences. ERIC Document
Reproduction Service no. ED 461 992.
Yeh, S. (1998). Empowering education: Teaching
argumentative writing to cultural minority middle-school students. Research in Teaching of English, 33, 49-83.
Yu, V., & Atkinson, P. (1988). An investigation of the
language difficulties experienced by Hong Kong
secondary school students in English Medium schools: Pt. 1.The problems. Journal of Multilingual andMulticultural Development, 9(3), 267-284.
Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 79-102.
Zare-ee, A., & Farvardin, M. T. (2009). Comparison of University Level EFL learners’ Linguistic and Rhetorical Patterns as Reflected in their L1 and L2 Writing. Novitas Royal: Research on Youth and Language, 3(2), 143-155.
Zobl, H., & Liceras, J.M. (1994). Review Article: Functional
categories and acquisition orders. Language Learning, 44, 159-180.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.