Nursing Diagnosis and Collaborative Problem among Hospitalized Patients in University of Sumatera Utara Hospital, Medan

Roxsana Devi Tumanggor, Nurbaiti Nurbaiti

Abstract


Background: The research regarding nursing diagnosis and collaboration problems were not very often conducted in Indonesia. Therefore, it is need to establish researches in standardized nursing language. Aims. The aim of this research was identified the nursing diagnosis and problem collaborations among hospitalized patients in University of Sumatera Utara Hospital, Indonesia. Method. This study is a quantitative research with cross-sectional approach. The data collection conducted through the nursing assessment with six steps of diagnostic reasoning method. The sampling technique was total sampling which involved hospitalized patients from March until May 2016; consisting 72 patients in inpatients unit which 19 pediatric patients, 36 adult patients, six maternity patients and 11 intensive care unit patients. The data analysis was frequency distribution from nursing diagnosis and problem collaborations. Result. The result revealed that there were 38 nursing diagnosis and collaborative problems found among pediatric patients, 56 nursing diagnosis and collaborative problems found among adult patients, 47 nursing diagnosis and collaborative problems found among intensive care patients and only eight nursing diagnosis found among maternity patients. The risk for infection was the most common nursing diagnosis among pediatric and maternity patients with thrombocytopenia as the most common collaborative problem found among pediatric patients. Acute pain was the first rank of nursing diagnosis found among adult patients. And, bleeding was the main problem collaboration. The risk for disuse syndrome was the most nursing diagnosis established among patients in intensive care unit, with pneumothorax as the common collaborative problem. Conclusion: It was found that the most common nursing diagnosis found among hospitalized patients was the risk for infection with various collaborative problems. Therefore, it is needs to establish infection precaution in every unit in the future. In fact, the nursing intervention regarding the infection control should be done in every unit.

Keywords


NANDA Nursing Diagnosis; Problem Collaboration; Hospitalized Patients

Full Text:

PDF

References


Sanjaya MR. Health cost in Indonesia: evidence from IFLS and Susenas Data. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Indonesia. 2007. January.1-21

USU. 2016; Available from http://www.usu.ac.id/arsip-berita/99-accordion-3/196-kunjungan-pasien-ke-rs-usu-meningkat.html

Rutherford MA. Standardized Nursing Languange: what does it mean for nursing practice? The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing. 2008. January; 13(1)

Rycroft-Malone J, Bick DE, Seers K. Protocol based care: impact on roles and service delivery. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2008. October. 867-73

Ammerwerth E, Kutcha U, Kutcha A, Mahler C, Eich Stadler R & Haux R. Nursing process documentation systems in clinical routine – prerequisites and experiences. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2001. (64). 187-200

Wilkinson JM. Nursing process and critical thinking, Pearson Education. 2007

Potter et al. Mapping the nursing process, a new approach for understanding the wor of nursing. JONA. 2004;32(2);101-209

Bolster D; Manias E. Person-centred interactions between nurses and patients during medication activities in an acute hospital setting: qualitative observation and interview study. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2010;(47);154-165

Lunney M. Accuracy of nurses’ diagnoses: foundaton of NANDA,NIC, and NOC. Nursing Diagnosis. 1998. April-June;9(2):83-85

Carpenito L. Nursing diagnosis, application to clinical practice. 13rd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2010

Nurjannah I, Warsini S & Mill, J. Comparing methods of diagnostic reasoning in nursing. GSTF International Journal of Nursing and Health Care. October. 2013;1(1);89-96

Herdman, TH. Nursing diagnoses and definitions and classifications 2012-2014. Wiley-Blackwell. 2012

Nurjannah I. ISDA Intan’s Screening Diagnoses Assessment. 2nd ed. Mocomedia. 2012

Ogasawara et al. Nursing diagnoses and interventions of Japanesepatients with end-stage breast cancer admitted different care purposes. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. Jul-Dec. 2005;16(3-4);54-64

Kim JK. A study on nursing diagnoses, interventions, outcomesfrequently used and linkge to NANDA-NOC-NIC in major departments. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2010;16(2);121-142

Beck-Sague C, Banerjee S & Jarvis W. Infectious diseases and mortality among US nursing home residents. American Journal of Public Health. December. 1993;83(12);1739-1742

Evers GC.Naming nursing: evicende based nursing. Nursing Diagnosis. Oct-Dec. 2001;12(4);137-142

Jones D, Lunney M, Gail K, Sue M. Standardized nursing languange,essesntials for the nursing workforce. Annual Review of Nursing Research. 2010;28(1);253-294

Lunney M. Helping nurses use NANDA, NOC and NIC. NurseEducators. 2006;31(1);40-46

Kung Hur H, Kim S, Storey M. Nursing diagnoses and interventions used in home care in Korea. Nursing Diagnosis. Jul-Sep. 2000;11(3);97-108

Head et al. Nursing diagnoses, interventions, and patients outcomes forhospitalized older adults with pneumonia. Research in Gerontological Nursing. 2011;4(2);95-105

Craft-Rosenberg M. Diagnoses for community nursing. Nursing Diagnosis. 1999;10(3);127-129

De Fatima Lucena & de Barros L. Nursing diagnosis in Brazilian intensive care unit. International Journal of Nursing Terminologiesand Classifications. Jul/Sep. 2006;17(3);139-146

Lunney M, McGuire M, Endozo N & McIntosh-Waddy D. Consesus validation study identifies relevant nursing diagnoses, nursing interventions, and health outcomes for people with traumatic brain injuries. Rehabilitation Nursing. Jul/Aug. 2000;35(4);161-166

Joosten K & Hulst J. Prevalence of malnutrition in pediatric hospital patients. Current Opinion in Pediatric. 2008;20;590-596


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.